Reply-To: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/11] uapi: export all headers under uapi directories
References: <20170301045241.GB9156@gondor.apana.org.au>
 <1488473802-13354-1-git-send-email-nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
To: arnd@arndb.de, mmarek@suse.com
Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, airlied@linux.ie, davem@davemloft.net,
        linux@armlinux.org.uk, bp@alien8.de, slash.tmp@free.fr,
        daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch, rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk, msalter@redhat.com,
        jengelh@inai.de, hch@infradead.org, tklauser@distanz.ch,
        mpe@ellerman.id.au, mingo@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
        ldv@altlinux.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
        linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Organization: 6WIND
Message-ID: <3df45ecc-1aa0-a029-d7e5-2598f0908874@6wind.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:34:18 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1488473802-13354-1-git-send-email-nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1189
Lines: 27

Le 02/03/2017 à 17:56, Nicolas Dichtel a écrit :
> Patches #1 and #2 are just cleanup: some exported headers were still under
> a non-uapi directory. Patch #3 is a fix to avoid exporting a file that was
> not under an uapi directory.
> After these three patches, all exported headers are under an uapi directory:
> path #4 stops searching files in non uapi directories.
> The patch #5 was spotted by code review: there is no in-tree user of this
> functionality.
> Patch #6 fixes some warnings/errors reported by 0-day tests.
> Patch #7 to #9 fix some errors when the corresponding files are included by
> userland.
> Patches #10 and #11 remove the need to list explicitly headers. Now all files
> under an uapi directory are exported.
> 
> This series has been tested with a 'make headers_install' on x86 and a
> 'make headers_install_all'. I've checked the result of both commands.
> 
> This patch is built against linus tree. If I must rebase it against the kbuild
> tree, just tell me.
> Michal, is this series going through your tree?
Still waiting to know who may take this series in its tree ;-)
kbuild tree has not been updated since two months (4.10-rc1) :/


Regards,
Nicolas