Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932600AbdCLFZI (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Mar 2017 00:25:08 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:34072 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751347AbdCLFZD (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Mar 2017 00:25:03 -0500 Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 06:24:17 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Kevin Hilman Cc: "kernelci.org bot" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuahkh@osg.samsung.com, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, stable@vger.kernel.org, andy.gross@linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.10 000/167] 4.10.2-stable review Message-ID: <20170312052417.GD22750@kroah.com> References: <20170310083956.767605269@linuxfoundation.org> <58c2b8ac.1f002e0a.ae306.aa13@mx.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1881 Lines: 56 On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 03:24:52PM -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote: > kernelci.org bot writes: > > > stable-rc boot: 541 boots: 6 failed, 500 passed with 34 offline, 1 conflict (v4.10.1-168-gcdc1f9d24aac) > > > > Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/kernel/v4.10.1-168-gcdc1f9d24aac/ > > Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/kernel/v4.10.1-168-gcdc1f9d24aac/ > > > > Tree: stable-rc > > Branch: local/linux-4.10.y > > Git Describe: v4.10.1-168-gcdc1f9d24aac > > Git Commit: cdc1f9d24aac385a7fe4611d7b42f51e20f49cdb > > Git URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > > Tested: 101 unique boards, 25 SoC families, 30 builds out of 204 > > > > Boot Regressions Detected: > > > > arm: > > > > multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y: > > am335x-pepper: > > lab-baylibre-seattle: new failure (last pass: v4.10-21-gd23a9821d397) > > This one is a new regression, and a first attempt at bisect was > inconclusive. > > > Boot Failures Detected: > > > > arm64: > > > > defconfig+CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE=y > > alpine-v2-evp: 1 failed lab > > This one appears to be a new board in the Free Electrons lab, which > doesn't have a history of passing. > > Quentin, Antoine: blacklist or fix? > > > apm-mustang: 1 failed lab > > juno: 1 failed lab > > These aren't new and have to do with broken boot firmware/UEFI that > cannot cope with bigger kernels. The folks in the Linaro Cambridge lab > are looking into upgrading the firmware. > > > arm: > > qcom_defconfig > > qcom-apq8064-cm-qs600: 1 failed lab > > qcom-apq8064-ifc6410: 1 failed lab > > These also exist in v4.10 mainline and have been reported to qcom > maintainer Andy Gross (cc'd). Thanks for the analysis of all of these, much appreciated. greg k-h