Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262496AbTEVFn0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 May 2003 01:43:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262498AbTEVFn0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 May 2003 01:43:26 -0400 Received: from modemcable204.207-203-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca ([24.203.207.204]:41088 "EHLO montezuma.mastecende.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262496AbTEVFn0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 May 2003 01:43:26 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 01:46:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Zwane Mwaikambo X-X-Sender: zwane@montezuma.mastecende.com To: Paul Rolland cc: "'Corey Minyard'" , "" Subject: Re: e100 latency, cpu cycle saver and e1000... In-Reply-To: <019c01c32025$e4d2b9c0$3f00a8c0@witbe> Message-ID: References: <019c01c32025$e4d2b9c0$3f00a8c0@witbe> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 581 Lines: 17 On Thu, 22 May 2003, Paul Rolland wrote: > Of course, the problem may be completely unrelated to the NIC, > my initial question being : is there a CPU Cycle Saver on the e1000 > as there is one on the e100... ;-) I suppose you could call the hardware RX/TX interrupt mitigation a 'cpu cycle saver' Zwane -- function.linuxpower.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/