Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752110AbdCNNSw (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Mar 2017 09:18:52 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:51798 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751688AbdCNNSu (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Mar 2017 09:18:50 -0400 Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 10:18:39 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Michael Ellerman Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" , Masami Hiramatsu , Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] powerpc: kretprobes: override default function entry offset Message-ID: <20170314131839.GD3089@kernel.org> References: <53bcae5a711eab803c9c3210110e8a464df34202.1488961018.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <87o9xcujzi.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> <20170308142412.GI11046@naverao1-tp.localdomain> <20170308142916.GA3035@kernel.org> <20170308164644.GK11046@naverao1-tp.localdomain> <87a88vuf9p.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87a88vuf9p.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1145 Lines: 27 Em Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 05:37:38PM +1100, Michael Ellerman escreveu: > "Naveen N. Rao" writes: > > On 2017/03/08 11:29AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > >> > I wasn't sure if you were planning on picking up KPROBES_ON_FTRACE for > >> > v4.11. If so, it would be good to take this patch through the powerpc > >> > tree. Otherwise, this can go via Ingo's tree. > >> > >> If you guys convince Ingo that this should go _now_, then just cherry > >> pick what was merged into tip/perf/core that is needed for the arch > >> specific stuff and go from there. > > > > Ok, in hindsight, I think Michael's concern was actually for v4.12 > > Yes I was talking about 4.12, sorry I thought that was implied :) > > > itself, in which case this particular patch can go via powerpc tree, > > while the rest of the patches in this series can go via your tree. > > > > Michael? > > Yeah I think that's the easiest option. The function will be temporarily > unused until the two trees are merged, but I think that's fine. Ok, done that, now compile testing building it in my multi-distro/x-build containers. - Arnaldo