Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263365AbTEVWf0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 May 2003 18:35:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263373AbTEVWf0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 May 2003 18:35:26 -0400 Received: from e6.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.106]:20400 "EHLO e6.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263365AbTEVWfR (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 May 2003 18:35:17 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] 1/2 Add exposure of the irq delivery mask on x86 From: Keith Mannthey To: James.Bottomley@steeleye.com Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 22 May 2003 15:50:35 -0700 Message-Id: <1053643837.19335.4816.camel@dyn9-47-17-180.beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 594 Lines: 16 >>This exposes a delivery mask in /proc//mask for the userspace irq >>balancer to use in its calculations. What exactly are you trying to expose? These patches look to just show what cpus are on-line. Wouldn't this just be the cpu_online_map in all cases? I guess I am a little confuses by what a "delivery mask" is. Thanks, Keith - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/