Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753378AbdCNPSv (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Mar 2017 11:18:51 -0400 Received: from mail-pg0-f66.google.com ([74.125.83.66]:36429 "EHLO mail-pg0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751159AbdCNPSp (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Mar 2017 11:18:45 -0400 From: Andrey Smirnov To: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Cc: Andrey Smirnov , yurovsky@gmail.com, Lucas Stach , Bjorn Helgaas , Fabio Estevam , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v6 2/4] PCI: imx6: Do not wait for speed change on i.MX7 Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 08:18:25 -0700 Message-Id: <20170314151827.31248-3-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.9.3 In-Reply-To: <20170314151827.31248-1-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> References: <20170314151827.31248-1-andrew.smirnov@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2470 Lines: 70 As can be seen from [1]: "...the different behavior between iMX6Q PCIe and iMX7D PCIe maybe caused by the different controller version. Regarding to the DOC description, the DIRECT_SPEED_CHANGE should be cleared after the speed change from GEN1 to GEN2. Unfortunately, when GEN1 device is used, the behavior is not documented. So, IC design guys run the simulation and find out the following behaviors: 1. DIRECT_SPEED_CHANGE will be cleared in 7D after speed change from GEN1 to GEN2. This matches doc’s description 2. set MAX link speed(PCIE_CAP_TARGET_LINK_SPEED=0x01) as GEN1 and re-run the simulation, DIRECT_SPEED_CHANGE will not be cleared; remain as 1, this matches your result, but function test is passed, so this bit should not affect the normal PCIe function. ..." imx6_pcie_wait_for_speed_change will report false failures for Gen1 -> Gen1 speed transition, so avoid doing that check and just rely on imx6_pcie_wait_for_link only. [1] https://community.nxp.com/message/867943 Cc: yurovsky@gmail.com Cc: Lucas Stach Cc: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Fabio Estevam Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov --- drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c | 19 +++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c index 2f3f375..473bbdc 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c @@ -577,10 +577,21 @@ static int imx6_pcie_establish_link(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie) tmp |= PORT_LOGIC_SPEED_CHANGE; dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL, tmp); - ret = imx6_pcie_wait_for_speed_change(imx6_pcie); - if (ret) { - dev_err(dev, "Failed to bring link up!\n"); - goto err_reset_phy; + if (imx6_pcie->variant != IMX7D) { + /* + * On i.MX7, DIRECT_SPEED_CHANGE behaves differently + * from i.MX6 family when no link speed transition + * occurs and we go Gen1 -> yep, Gen1. The difference + * is that, in such case, it will not be cleared by HW + * which will cause the following code to report false + * failure. + */ + + ret = imx6_pcie_wait_for_speed_change(imx6_pcie); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "Failed to bring link up!\n"); + goto err_reset_phy; + } } /* Make sure link training is finished as well! */ -- 2.9.3