Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752229AbdCNUYM (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Mar 2017 16:24:12 -0400 Received: from smtp-out-no.shaw.ca ([64.59.134.12]:46502 "EHLO smtp-out-no.shaw.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750837AbdCNUYL (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Mar 2017 16:24:11 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=P9pKvmIu c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=6xzog4CasRozao6qlzTIAw==:117 a=6xzog4CasRozao6qlzTIAw==:17 a=6Iz7jQTuP9IA:10 a=Q-fNiiVtAAAA:8 a=VwQbUJbxAAAA:8 a=z8K0uCrveewTdV9x0gAA:9 a=Fp8MccfUoT0GBdDC_Lng:22 a=AjGcO6oz07-iQ99wixmX:22 From: Markus Mayer To: Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland Cc: Markus Mayer , Linux Clock Mailing List , Device Tree Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: [RFC 0/2] Basic divider clock Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:22:34 -0700 Message-Id: <20170314202236.39910-1-code@mmayer.net> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.10.2 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfBXXbTeFmfOeOGY8wBNKno+luXbD+kNWZW60s+Uh2mMrcqryap34Vt6XRsspsT6M93/P6Pt7HPgHuNtLMJtq+CYt0qtMkUVQKohT9LZ+Ah55I7FJKXbi +Q2VhP0O1cuOMn2Q1JPkCxPD3nQouz+4FvHsF/Z1tyBbyN3rhLth+OJ+5o2wXDDIaiFTSWB1BTEfPjZPx7rlQtMa5tetOlLiP5AhCnKOQ5g3Yb8HjN+HdSw0 g17BNjGu6gCoPyfCJ9Tvf5cGXH1O/G3mKABlSwwrBGbOyvbn/SbwS47mR3JLv0LKj4CDCiq1OmN1LbEynPHG3fcLowJZhZv4LY3L50P2RJOYfCNY0/abWl6d 8k5FYkPLXTQEKBQGtW9WLcdNOh9uwN/5Evr0vRUdTKu+KAJ5DUJKAKJ+cYlYhFQollGmKY1d Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1512 Lines: 39 From: Markus Mayer This series contains a patch that was originally submitted by Mike Turquette in August 2013, but never merged.[1] Although I didn't see any comments rejecting it. We have been using this code for our STB platform for quite some time and wouldn't mind seeing it upstream. What are the current thoughts on merging this code? The patch is almost entirely how Mike submitted it originally. For the purposes of this RFC, I kept my modifications separate, to make it easier to see what is different from the original. I am expecting that my modifications would need to be squashed into the main patch with annotations in the commit message. There were trivial conflicts applying the original patch to 4.11-rc1. Those were entirely due to the patch context changing (clk_hw_unregister_divider() didn't exist back then) and not due to any incompatibilities with the patch itself. The other changes I made are listed and described in patch 2/2. [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2848065/ Markus Mayer (1): clk: divider: modifications for 4.11 Mike Turquette (1): clk: dt: binding for basic divider clock .../devicetree/bindings/clock/divider-clock.txt | 90 +++++++++++++++++++ drivers/clk/clk-divider.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++- include/linux/clk-provider.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 190 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/divider-clock.txt -- 2.7.4