Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263656AbTEWGQ0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 May 2003 02:16:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263654AbTEWGQZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 May 2003 02:16:25 -0400 Received: from zeus.kernel.org ([204.152.189.113]:15569 "EHLO zeus.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263652AbTEWGQZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 May 2003 02:16:25 -0400 Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 07:27:45 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Pete Zaitcev , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com Subject: Re: Patch to add SysRq handling to 3270 console Message-ID: <20030523072745.A5368@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Arnd Bergmann , Pete Zaitcev , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com References: <20030522225014$1daf@gated-at.bofh.it> <200305222316.h4MNGk8H004738@post.webmailer.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <200305222316.h4MNGk8H004738@post.webmailer.de>; from arnd@arndb.de on Fri, May 23, 2003 at 01:12:20AM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 661 Lines: 14 On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 01:12:20AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > duplicated work. Do you have a tested backport for 2.4.2x? If > so, we could merge it for the z990 code drop. What is the z990 code drop? Can you please merge support for new hardware into mainline instead of realsing it in these silly IBM patchkits for old kernels with exploitable security issues.. Btw, what's the state of 2.4.21-rc3 vs s390(x)? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/