Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752848AbdCOJv4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Mar 2017 05:51:56 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f47.google.com ([209.85.214.47]:38848 "EHLO mail-it0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751756AbdCOJvy (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Mar 2017 05:51:54 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Linus Walleij Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 10:51:52 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/19] fixup usage of non-raw spinlocks in irqchips To: Julia Cartwright Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Thomas Gleixner , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Julia Lawall , Gilles Muller , Nicolas Palix , Michal Marek , cocci@systeme.lip6.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 519 Lines: 13 On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Julia Cartwright wrote: > The following patchset introduces a new coccinelle patch, > irq_chip_raw_spinlock.cocci, which is used to identify irq_chip implementors > which acquire/release non-raw spinlocks, and in addition, a set of generated > patches for most cases identified. Wow that is really impressive. I expect to apply all that are applicable to GPIO drivers. I guess this really lowers the bar to run realtime on a whole slew of systems. Yours, Linus Walleij