Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752830AbdCOJ5y (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Mar 2017 05:57:54 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f52.google.com ([209.85.214.52]:38765 "EHLO mail-it0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752005AbdCOJ5w (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Mar 2017 05:57:52 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <78b657c5-0f6a-6481-a0cf-e241c0632c7f@broadcom.com> References: <77d635877e765a6b4b0935debfe5836e554572c0.1489015238.git.julia@ni.com> <78b657c5-0f6a-6481-a0cf-e241c0632c7f@broadcom.com> From: Linus Walleij Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 10:57:49 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/19] gpio: bcm-kona: make use of raw_spinlock variants To: Ray Jui Cc: Julia Cartwright , Ray Jui , Alexandre Courbot , Florian Fainelli , Scott Branden , bcm-kernel-feedback-list , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Thomas Gleixner , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 275 Lines: 9 On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 6:28 PM, Ray Jui wrote: > Is such API use change well accepted by the open source community already? The raw_*spinlock APIs are in the kernel header files and used at several sites in the kernel, so yes. Yours, Linus Walleij