From: "Oliver Pitzeier" <o.pitzeier@uptime.at>
To: "'Sven Krohlas'" <darkshadow@web.de>
Cc: <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>, <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
       <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Aix7xxx unstable in 2.4.21-rc2? (RE: Linux 2.4.21-rc2)
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 10:48:44 +0200
Organization: UPtime system solutions
Message-ID: <002c01c32108$1e4bb980$020b10ac@pitzeier.priv.at>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <3ECDCA64.3090604@web.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 969
Lines: 31

[ ... ]
> > You didn't see a kernel panic as well? I'm asking, because 
> I have the 
> > same problems with one of my machines...
> 
> No panic, nothing in the logs.

Same for me...
 
> > When was this problem introduced? Does 2.4.19, or 2.4.20 work well?
> 
> 2.4.19 & .20 worked "fine", well, at least without DMA mode. 
> But they are stable.

I installed 2.4.19 (because I know it's stable - at least for me) yesterday on
my machine and no it runs stable again (it seems, because it's now up for more
than 15 hours). With 2.4.21-rc[1,2], I never had such a long uptime. :-)

[ ... ]

OK. So now I have to say: _Don't_ use 2.4.20-rc* if you have a aic7xxx. You can
use 2.4.19 and maybe 2.4.20(?).

Best regards,
 Oliver

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/