Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753945AbdCOO3B (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Mar 2017 10:29:01 -0400 Received: from mail.aperture-lab.de ([138.201.29.205]:52547 "EHLO mail.aperture-lab.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753293AbdCOO13 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Mar 2017 10:27:29 -0400 Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:27:20 +0100 From: Linus =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=BCssing?= To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Cc: Florian Westphal , netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" , Stephen Hemminger , Jozsef Kadlecsik , bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bridge: ebtables: fix reception of frames DNAT-ed to bridge device Message-ID: <20170315142720.GU15692@otheros> References: <20170315031811.22714-1-linus.luessing@c0d3.blue> <20170315102608.GB24366@breakpoint.cc> <20170315104211.GA24409@salvia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170315104211.GA24409@salvia> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 473 Lines: 10 On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:42:11AM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > I'm missing then why redirect is not then just enough for Linus usecase. For my usecase, the MAC address is configured by the user from a Web-UI. It may or may not be the one from the bridge device. Besides, found it counter intuitive that DNAT did not work here and took me some time to find out why. At least I didn't read about any such known limitations of the dnat target in the ebtables manpage.