Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751226AbdCQJQa (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Mar 2017 05:16:30 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:32980 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751021AbdCQJQ2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Mar 2017 05:16:28 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 18:05:54 +0900 From: Masami Hiramatsu To: Ravi Bangoria Cc: mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org, brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com, peterz@infradead.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, wangnan0@huawei.com, jolsa@kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com, treeze.taeung@gmail.com, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, hekuang@huawei.com, sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, ananth@in.ibm.com, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hemant@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/7] perf/sdt: Directly record SDT events with 'perf record' Message-Id: <20170317180554.c6b69de1e655eee60e723dbd@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20170314150658.7065-4-ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20170314150658.7065-1-ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170314150658.7065-4-ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3159 Lines: 134 Hi Ravi, (I avoided to review parser part since it may go to yacc in next version) On Tue, 14 Mar 2017 20:36:54 +0530 Ravi Bangoria wrote: [SNIP] > @@ -1516,9 +1534,10 @@ static bool dry_run; > * using pipes, etc. > */ > static struct option __record_options[] = { > - OPT_CALLBACK('e', "event", &record.evlist, "event", > - "event selector. use 'perf list' to list available events", > - parse_events_option), > + OPT_CALLBACK_ARG('e', "event", &record.evlist, > + &record.sdt_event_list, "event", > + "event selector. use 'perf list' to list available events", > + record__parse_events_option), Does --event option NOT requires argument without this patch? If it should be changed to use OPT_CALLBACK_ARG(), would it be better merge this part to previous patch? [SNIP] > +/* > + * Delete the SDT events from uprobe_events file that > + * were created initially. > + */ > +void remove_sdt_event_list(struct list_head *sdt_events) > +{ > + struct sdt_event_list *sdt_event; > + struct strfilter *filter = NULL; > + const char *err = NULL; > + > + if (list_empty(sdt_events)) > + return; > + > + list_for_each_entry(sdt_event, sdt_events, list) { > + if (!filter) { > + filter = strfilter__new(sdt_event->name, &err); > + if (!filter) > + goto free_list; Don't we need to return error code for this case? > + } else { > + strfilter__or(filter, sdt_event->name, &err); strfilter__or() can fail here. > + } > + } > + > + del_perf_probe_events(filter); Here too, if it is ignored silently by design, please comment it here. > + > +free_list: > + free_sdt_list(sdt_events); > +} > + > +static int get_sdt_events_from_cache(struct perf_probe_event *pev) > +{ > + int ret = 0; > + > + pev->ntevs = find_cached_events_all(pev, &pev->tevs); > + > + if (pev->ntevs < 0) { > + pr_err("Error: Cache lookup failed (code: %d)\n", pev->ntevs); > + ret = pev->ntevs; > + } else if (!pev->ntevs) { > + pr_err("Error: %s:%s not found in the cache\n", > + pev->group, pev->event); > + ret = -EINVAL; > + } else if (pev->ntevs > 1) { > + pr_warning("Warning : Recording on %d occurences of %s:%s\n", > + pev->ntevs, pev->group, pev->event); > + } > + > + return ret; > +} > + > +static int add_event_to_sdt_evlist(struct probe_trace_event *tev, > + struct list_head *sdt_evlist) > +{ > + struct sdt_event_list *tmp; Well, strbuf can make this simpler as below ;-) struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT; > + > + tmp = zalloc(sizeof(*tmp)); > + if (!tmp) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tmp->list); if (strbuf_addf(&buf, "%s:%s", tev->group, tev->event)) goto error; tmp->name = strbuf_detach(&buf); > + list_add(&tmp->list, sdt_evlist); > + > + return 0; error: free(tmp); return -ENOMEM; > +} > + > +static int add_events_to_sdt_evlist(struct perf_probe_event *pev, > + struct list_head *sdt_evlist) > +{ > + int i, ret; > + > + for (i = 0; i < pev->ntevs; i++) { > + ret = add_event_to_sdt_evlist(&pev->tevs[i], sdt_evlist); > + > + if (ret < 0) > + return ret; > + } > + return 0; > +} Thanks, -- Masami Hiramatsu