Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262303AbTEXSYn (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 May 2003 14:24:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262589AbTEXSYn (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 May 2003 14:24:43 -0400 Received: from charger.oldcity.dca.net ([207.245.82.76]:32664 "EHLO charger.oldcity.dca.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262303AbTEXSYm (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 May 2003 14:24:42 -0400 Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 14:37:48 -0400 From: "Mark M. Hoffman" To: LKML , Sensors Subject: [OOPS] w83781d during rmmod (2.5.69-bk17) Message-ID: <20030524183748.GA3097@earth.solarsys.private> Mail-Followup-To: LKML , Sensors Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 875 Lines: 23 This applies to all kernel versions since w83781d was brought in from the lm_sensors project. The subclients of w83781d are never registered with i2c_attach_client(). But, w83781d_detach_client() tries to i2c_detach_client() them anyway. This was harmless, until i2c-core was "listified"... because the old array method silently ignored the attempt to detach a non-existent client. The latest lm_sensors CVS of w83781d has the necessary i2c_attach_client() calls - not sure why they were removed during conversion to 2.5.x. Do we intend to attach these subclients or not? Regards, -- Mark M. Hoffman mhoffman@lightlink.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/