Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751202AbdCQQ46 (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Mar 2017 12:56:58 -0400 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.104]:64808 "EHLO mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751065AbdCQQ45 (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Mar 2017 12:56:57 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,177,1486422000"; d="scan'208";a="217137454" Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 17:55:42 +0100 (CET) From: Julia Lawall X-X-Sender: jll@hadrien To: Pavel Machek cc: Greg KH , Stephen Warren , Scott Branden , Julia Lawall , lee@kernel.org, eric@anholt.net, f.fainelli@gmail.com, rjui@broadcom.com, sbranden@broadcom.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: outreachy In-Reply-To: <20170317152519.GA8684@amd> Message-ID: References: <443f0143-aec1-2559-a2c2-73b245632948@broadcom.com> <2da12619-5fcb-9e0f-b6c1-c83cbf491e8d@wwwdotorg.org> <20170309212021.GA24433@kroah.com> <20170317152519.GA8684@amd> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1462 Lines: 41 On Fri, 17 Mar 2017, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > > Hah! That's the joy of being a maintainer of a driver in staging. Even > > if you filter out outreachy, you are going to get a lot of "basic > > mistakes" and other type patches cc:ed to you. > > > > I strongly suggest, that if you all don't like this type of stuff, > > either: > > - work to get the code out of staging as soon as possible (i.e. > > send me coding style fixes for everything right now, and then > > fix up the rest of the stuff.) > > - take yourself off the maintainer list for this code. > > > > It's your choice, outreachy right now is a lot of patches, but again, > > it's not going to keep you from getting the "basic" stuff sent to you > > in ways that is totally wrong. > > Could we get these trivial patches off the lkml? Yes, lkml already has > a lot of traffic, but no, this is not useful :-(. The outreachy instructions say to use the -nol argument to get_maintainers, which would prevent them from being sent to any mailing list. However others thought that all patches should be sent to mailing lists, and so I haven't enforced anything for people who have omitted -nol. However I have tried to remove bcm maintainers from CC lists on replies and reminded people not to send you patches, julia > > Pavel > -- > (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek > (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html >