Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261669AbTEYJM7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 May 2003 05:12:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261566AbTEYJM7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 May 2003 05:12:59 -0400 Received: from 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk ([81.2.122.30]:38528 "EHLO 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261564AbTEYJM5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 May 2003 05:12:57 -0400 Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 11:32:09 +0100 From: john@grabjohn.com Message-Id: <200305251032.h4PAW9hK000616@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> To: john@grabjohn.com, zwane@linuxpower.ca Subject: Re: [RFR] a new SCSI driver Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1940 Lines: 41 > > Thinking ahead, by the 2.8 timescale, PATA could well be legacy hardware > > which could be supported only by an 'old' IDE driver, much like we already > > have at the moment - I.E. we could remove the current 'old' IDE driver > > sometime during the 2.7 timescale, and support SATA only via the SCSI layer. > > > > This would save having any more than the minimum SATA code going in to the > > existing IDE driver, and consolidate work in the future. > PATA is in _way_ too many current boxes, those computers will continue to > run for a very long time from now. That would be the reason for the old IDE driver. PATA will still be in use, but it won't be mainstream. > In 10 years what is technologically obselete will still be very capable. Of course it will - the same is true today. That doesn't mean it will be in mainstream use. The systems that do use PATA will benefit from having it supported in a smaller footprint driver. It will be analogous to using the current 'old' IDE driver on a 4 MB 386 today. > > The bloat of the SCSI layer in embedded machines might be a concern, but > > then again, maybe it won't - how many embedded machines are going to be > > using SATA, anyway? Once we move away from spinning disks towards solid > > state storage, (which is going to happen first in the embedded market), > > will we want to use *ATA or SCSI at all? > You're confusing media and transport. No, I'm not. 20-40 GB of RAM will be very cheap in a few years time. A lot of the devices using disks today will be using direct memory mapped RAM as their main storage in the near future. You don't need *ATA for that... John. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/