Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261704AbTEYKBC (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 May 2003 06:01:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261670AbTEYKBC (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 May 2003 06:01:02 -0400 Received: from 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk ([81.2.122.30]:41088 "EHLO 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261651AbTEYKBB (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 May 2003 06:01:01 -0400 Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 12:19:24 +0100 From: john@grabjohn.com Message-Id: <200305251119.h4PBJOal000678@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> To: john@grabjohn.com, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: [RFR] a new SCSI driver Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1109 Lines: 22 > > Thinking ahead, by the 2.8 timescale, PATA could well be legacy hardware > > which could be supported only by an 'old' IDE driver, much like we already > > have at the moment - I.E. we could remove the current 'old' IDE driver > > sometime during the 2.7 timescale, and support SATA only via the SCSI layer. > Rubbish. PIO mode ATA will be around for some years to come - there > is just too much invested there (especially in the embedded world) for > it to vanish this quickly. For example, think about compact flash cards, > many of which are still driven using PIO mode accesses in todays PDAs. Why couldn't PDAs be served by the 'old' driver then? Old doesn't mean obsolete. Also embedded world != PDAs. I was thinking more of things like PVRs, and blade servers. What about solid state video cameras? Are they going to use PIO mode ATA? John. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/