Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754291AbdCTLAx (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Mar 2017 07:00:53 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:48408 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753071AbdCTK5J (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Mar 2017 06:57:09 -0400 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 11:38:15 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux PM , LKML , Srinivas Pandruvada , Viresh Kumar , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Patrick Bellasi , Joel Fernandes , Morten Rasmussen , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Force max frequency on busy CPUs Message-ID: <20170320103815.za7bgz4ttz67s746@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <4366682.tsferJN35u@aspire.rjw.lan> <2185243.flNrap3qq1@aspire.rjw.lan> <135462462.sTWZ8TCakW@aspire.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <135462462.sTWZ8TCakW@aspire.rjw.lan> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 344 Lines: 7 On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 10:24:24PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Honestly, if the processor had been capable of doing per-core P-states, that > would have been a disaster and there are customers who wouldn't look at > schedutil again after being confronted with these numbers. This, I feel, is a bit overstated. We have bug, we fix them.