Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263055AbTEYQeC (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 May 2003 12:34:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263270AbTEYQeC (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 May 2003 12:34:02 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]:58242 "EHLO main.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263055AbTEYQeB (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 May 2003 12:34:01 -0400 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Nicholas Wourms Subject: Re: 2.5.69-mm9 Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 12:47:08 -0400 Message-ID: <3ED0F38C.5020203@myrealbox.com> References: <20030525042759.6edacd62.akpm@digeo.com> <200305251456.39404.rudmer@legolas.dynup.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 915 Lines: 21 Rudmer van Dijk wrote: > On Sunday 25 May 2003 13:27, Andrew Morton wrote: > >>. 2.5.69-mm9 is not for the timid. It includes extensive changes to the >> ext3 filesystem and the JBD layer. It withstood an hour of testing on my >> 4-way, but it probably has a couple of holes still. > > > there seems to be no problem, it survives a kernel compile. > Only the patch for fs/buffer.c seems to be reverted, it was there in -mm8 > (original patch by wli, adjusted to cleanly apply against -mm9) > > Rudmer > It looks like he "silently" updated aio-06-bread_wq-fix.patch with an additional fix, but it overwrote the existing diffs in that file. Cheers, Nicholas - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/