Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754844AbdCTMno (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Mar 2017 08:43:44 -0400 Received: from cloudserver094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:50245 "EHLO cloudserver094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753477AbdCTMnl (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Mar 2017 08:43:41 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Linux PM , LKML , Srinivas Pandruvada , Viresh Kumar , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Patrick Bellasi , Joel Fernandes , Morten Rasmussen , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: schedutil: Force max frequency on busy CPUs Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 13:31:23 +0100 Message-ID: <7613782.1PkZjHhM6h@aspire.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.10.0+; KDE/4.14.9; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20170320103815.za7bgz4ttz67s746@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <4366682.tsferJN35u@aspire.rjw.lan> <135462462.sTWZ8TCakW@aspire.rjw.lan> <20170320103815.za7bgz4ttz67s746@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 479 Lines: 14 On Monday, March 20, 2017 11:38:15 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 10:24:24PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Honestly, if the processor had been capable of doing per-core P-states, that > > would have been a disaster and there are customers who wouldn't look at > > schedutil again after being confronted with these numbers. > > This, I feel, is a bit overstated. Maybe a bit, but I'm not really sure ... > We have bug, we fix them. Of course. :-)