Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754895AbdCTNwf (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Mar 2017 09:52:35 -0400 Received: from conssluserg-01.nifty.com ([210.131.2.80]:37289 "EHLO conssluserg-01.nifty.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753627AbdCTNwd (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Mar 2017 09:52:33 -0400 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conssluserg-01.nifty.com v2KDqKRP029032 X-Nifty-SrcIP: [209.85.161.169] MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170320121328.GH17263@arm.com> References: <20161122213434.14788-1-mmarek@suse.com> <20170310175854.GE18894@arm.com> <20170320121328.GH17263@arm.com> From: Masahiro Yamada Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 22:52:19 +0900 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] arm64: Use full path in KBUILD_IMAGE definition To: Will Deacon , Michal Marek Cc: Linux Kbuild mailing list , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Catalin Marinas , linux-arm-kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1711 Lines: 59 2017-03-20 21:13 GMT+09:00 Will Deacon : > On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 10:14:41PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >> 2017-03-11 6:20 GMT+09:00 Michal Marek : >> > Dne 10.3.2017 v 18:58 Will Deacon napsal(a): >> >> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:34:29PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote: >> >>> The KBUILD_IMAGE variable is used by the rpm and deb-pkg targets, which >> >>> expect it to point to the image file in the build directory. The >> >>> builddeb script has a workaround for architectures which only provide >> >>> the basename, but let's provide a clean interface for packaging tools. >> >>> >> >>> Cc: Catalin Marinas >> >>> Cc: Will Deacon >> >>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org >> >>> Signed-off-by: Michal Marek >> >>> --- >> >>> arch/arm64/Makefile | 6 +++--- >> >>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> >> >> What's the plan for this patch? I'm happy to merge it, >> > >> > Great, please merge it. >> > >> >> but I don't see >> >> the rest of the series queued anywhere. >> > >> > I'll see what remains and submit the rest via the kbuild tree. >> > >> >> I like this approach, rather than fixing scripts/package/mkspec. >> >> >> So, how shall we handle this series? >> >> >> I am OK with getting 1/6 in through arm64 tree, >> but 6/6 will be postponed in the case. >> >> >> >> If Will issues Acked-by, I can pick-up the whole series >> to linux-kbuild. > > Ok, that works for me too. For the first patch: > > Acked-by: Will Deacon > > So please take this via linux-kbuild. > > Will Applied to linux-kbuild/misc. Thanks! -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada