Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754998AbdCTQrD (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Mar 2017 12:47:03 -0400 Received: from eddie.linux-mips.org ([148.251.95.138]:36002 "EHLO cvs.linux-mips.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755747AbdCTQpU (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Mar 2017 12:45:20 -0400 Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 17:43:48 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Ben Hutchings , Linux Kernel Mailing List , stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 04/35] MIPS: Update defconfigs for NF_CT_PROTO_DCCP/UDPLITE change Message-ID: <20170320164347.GG14919@linux-mips.org> References: <20170316142906.685052998@linuxfoundation.org> <20170316142906.994447562@linuxfoundation.org> <1489939516.2852.71.camel@decadent.org.uk> <20170320103052.GB3047@kroah.com> <20170320162930.GA23463@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170320162930.GA23463@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 516 Lines: 13 On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 05:29:30PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > You reported it there, but then on your other emails for other stable > trees, said that your previously mentioned patches fixed problems in > these trees as well. A bit confusing, sorry I got it wrong. > > Anyway, not a big deal, is this worth me reverting? Does this cause an > issue with these arches on older kernels? Can't imagine this is going to cause an issue and in case of doubt a "y" should be safer than a "m" anyway ... Ralf