Subject: Re: Aix7xxx unstable in 2.4.21-rc2? (RE: Linux 2.4.21-rc2)
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>,
       Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>, gibbs@scsiguy.com,
       acme@conectiva.com.br
In-Reply-To: <20030524064340.GA1451@alpha.home.local>
References: <1053732598.1951.13.camel@mulgrave>
	 <20030524064340.GA1451@alpha.home.local>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Organization: 
Message-Id: <1053923112.14018.16.camel@rth.ninka.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: 25 May 2003 21:25:13 -0700
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1125
Lines: 27

On Fri, 2003-05-23 at 23:43, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> As I said, I really hope that we'll have a quick 2.4.22 with bug fixes taken
> as a priority. The current pre-releases are as frequent and as big as what
> used to be full releases in the past.

I really think 2.4.x development is becoming almost non-existent
lately.

It's 5 or 6 days of silence, nothing happening at all, then a flurry
of 10 or 20 checkins and a -rc or -pre release.

If Conectiva needs to task Marcelo to so much work that he can only
really put 1 or 2 days a week into 2.4.x, this needs be rethought at
either one end (Conectiva finding a way to give him more 2.4.x time) or
another (Marcelo splits up the work with someone else or we simply find
another 2.4.x maintainer).

I really want something more -ac paced although that may be too extreme
for some people. :-)

-- 
David S. Miller <davem@redhat.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/