Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 19:18:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 19:17:58 -0500 Received: from enterprise.cistron.net ([195.64.68.33]:34571 "EHLO enterprise.cistron.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 19:17:55 -0500 From: miquels@cistron.nl (Miquel van Smoorenburg) Subject: Re: Where did kgcc go in 2.4.0-test10 ? Date: 2 Nov 2000 00:17:57 GMT Organization: Cistron Internet Services B.V. Lines: 21 Message-ID: <8tqbrl$q59$1@enterprise.cistron.net> In-Reply-To: <20001101234058.B1598@werewolf.able.es> <20001101235734.D10585@garloff.etpnet.phys.tue.nl> <200011012247.OAA19546@pizda.ninka.net> X-Trace: enterprise.cistron.net 973124277 26793 195.64.65.201 (2 Nov 2000 00:17:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@cistron.nl To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In article <200011012247.OAA19546@pizda.ninka.net>, David S. Miller wrote: > Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 23:57:34 +0100 > From: Kurt Garloff > > kgcc is a redhat'ism. > >Debian has it too. Not quite. Debian does have an completely optional gcc272 package. It is _not_ installed as kgcc (the binary is called gcc272) and you don't _have_ to compile your kernels with it. It is an optional package and you have to actively select and install it. By default Debian comes with gcc 2.95.2 which compiles current 2.2.x and 2.4.x kernels just fine. At least I haven't used gcc272 for kernels for at least a year now (I think, first egcs, then gcc 2.95) and on all the servers I administer (and that's quite a few) gcc 2.95 hasn't caused any problems. Mike. -- People get the operating system they deserve. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/