Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756282AbdCUF0k (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Mar 2017 01:26:40 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f174.google.com ([209.85.161.174]:34636 "EHLO mail-yw0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752098AbdCUF0i (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Mar 2017 01:26:38 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170320172647.t7qacxqcgawe7xlf@sirena.org.uk> References: <20170320035831.10762-1-kai.heng.feng@canonical.com> <20170320150845.7rltrhycdkk2mza4@sirena.org.uk> <20170320160622.5s2oqdyluvanjp2u@sirena.org.uk> <20170320172647.t7qacxqcgawe7xlf@sirena.org.uk> From: Kai-Heng Feng Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:25:43 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ASoC: rt286: fix headphone click/crack noise on Dell XPS 9343 I2S mode To: Mark Brown Cc: Liam Girdwood , Bard Liao , Oder Chiou , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1506 Lines: 38 On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 1:26 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:23:53AM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:06 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > >> > As it says there "...and inserted automatically following the three dash >> > line". > >> I saw iteration changelog in git log all over the place, maybe add a >> rule section for each subsystem? > > Some people won't push back, the only people who insist on anything > different are the graphics people. Got it. I think the way you suggested is better. > >> I had the same thought originally, but printk under each case suggests >> otherwise - _POST_PMU is triggered not right after _PRE_PMU but right >> before _PRE_PMD. > > Then you've broken something else on your system, that is obviously > completely nonsensical and would break anything that relies on having a > _POST_PMU event. Why would we have two events that run at the same time > one of which is obviously misnamed? Hmm, that's weird though. I did the same test to rt286_spk_event() (without applying the patch I sent), what I observed was the same: _POST_PMU was triggered right after I stopped play sound, i.e. right before _PRE_PMD not right after _PRE_PMU. > >> > > You didn't reply to my review comment and you sent the same code >> > > again. >> > That looks an awful lot like being ignored. > >> Fair enough, I thought changelog is sufficient. > > I'm not seeing anything in the changelog that addresses this.