Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262285AbTEZVeQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 May 2003 17:34:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262289AbTEZVeQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 May 2003 17:34:16 -0400 Received: from 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk ([81.2.122.30]:4482 "EHLO 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262285AbTEZVeP (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 May 2003 17:34:15 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 22:53:34 +0100 From: john@grabjohn.com Message-Id: <200305262153.h4QLrYVN001135@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> To: marcelo@conectiva.com.br, willy@w.ods.org Subject: Re: Aix7xxx unstable in 2.4.21-rc2? (RE: Linux 2.4.21-rc2) Cc: davem@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 891 Lines: 18 > > People often prefer "here is -rcxx-acxx, which my EPIA now fully > > supports" to "here is -rcxx, please test it extensively". > I dont understand what you mean. Smaller, more frequent patches, have the advantage of getting more widespread testing of a common codebase - the problem with testing individual patchsets separately is that it's quite possible that with only a few people testing any particular combination, bugs appear in a large -pre or -rc patchset, and prevent others from testing the rest of that patchset easily. A -pre every week, even if it only had a few changes, would get more bug reports in, (in my opinion). John. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/