Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262390AbTE0ALz (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 May 2003 20:11:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262400AbTE0ALz (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 May 2003 20:11:55 -0400 Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu ([198.82.162.213]:36617 "EHLO lennier.cc.vt.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262390AbTE0ALy (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 May 2003 20:11:54 -0400 Message-Id: <5.2.1.1.0.20030526202315.00a28990@pop.vt.edu> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.1 Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 20:25:31 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "John Anthony Kazos Jr." Subject: Re: [2.5] [Cool stuff] "checking" mode for kernel builds In-Reply-To: <3ED2AEA9.1000401@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 633 Lines: 16 > > +# Linus's kernel sanity checking tool > >IIRC my english lessons it should be >+# Linus' kernel sanity checking tool It's just like if you want to quote a command like "chroot," which is confusing and nasty and ugly, whereas using "chroot", while not really correct, is The Right Thing To Do. We computer scientists have our own, *more precise* form(s) of our language(s). ^_^ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/