Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752610AbdCWAaj (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:30:39 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-f53.google.com ([209.85.215.53]:36090 "EHLO mail-lf0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751660AbdCWAaa (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:30:30 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20170321220200.23145-1-jinqian@android.com> From: Jin Qian Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:23:57 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mmc: core: export emmc revision via sysfs To: Jaehoon Chung Cc: Ulf Hansson , Shawn Lin , Adrian Hunter , Linus Walleij , Uri Yanai , Dong Aisheng , Chaotian Jing , Pratibhasagar V , Gwendal Grignou , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1738 Lines: 57 Removed redundant signoff. export rev to collect some statistics on how many devices are running with which mmc revision. Other attr name seems follow cid. or ext_csd.. Thanks, jin On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote: > Hi, > > On 03/22/2017 07:01 AM, Jin Qian wrote: >> Extend sysfs to access ext_csd revision information. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jin Qian >> Signed-off-by: Jin Qian > > I think you can choose one of them for signed-off tag. > >> --- >> drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 2 ++ >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c >> index 7fd722868875..08c62c9bec48 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c >> @@ -779,6 +779,7 @@ MMC_DEV_ATTR(manfid, "0x%06x\n", card->cid.manfid); >> MMC_DEV_ATTR(name, "%s\n", card->cid.prod_name); >> MMC_DEV_ATTR(oemid, "0x%04x\n", card->cid.oemid); >> MMC_DEV_ATTR(prv, "0x%x\n", card->cid.prv); >> +MMC_DEV_ATTR(rev, "0x%x\n", card->ext_csd.rev); > > I'm not sure but if someone want to know ext_csd revision information, attribute name might be more clearly. > e,g) ext_csd_rev? > > It's my preference. :) > > Best Regards, > Jaehoon Chung > >> MMC_DEV_ATTR(pre_eol_info, "%02x\n", card->ext_csd.pre_eol_info); >> MMC_DEV_ATTR(life_time, "0x%02x 0x%02x\n", >> card->ext_csd.device_life_time_est_typ_a, >> @@ -836,6 +837,7 @@ static struct attribute *mmc_std_attrs[] = { >> &dev_attr_name.attr, >> &dev_attr_oemid.attr, >> &dev_attr_prv.attr, >> + &dev_attr_rev.attr, >> &dev_attr_pre_eol_info.attr, >> &dev_attr_life_time.attr, >> &dev_attr_serial.attr, >> >