Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965377AbdCWQTS (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2017 12:19:18 -0400 Received: from mail-ot0-f171.google.com ([74.125.82.171]:36288 "EHLO mail-ot0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965084AbdCWQTQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2017 12:19:16 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <58d36150.82ce190a.a6597.51eb@mx.google.com> References: <58d36150.82ce190a.a6597.51eb@mx.google.com> From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:19:14 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: vDDLQcLTLOonNIOcHOI41_esnII Message-ID: Subject: Re: next build: 208 builds: 9 failed, 199 passed, 857 errors, 444 warnings (next-20170323) To: "kernelci.org bot" Cc: kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, "Steven J. Hill" , Ralf Baechle Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.home.local id v2NGJMhq029003 Content-Length: 3057 Lines: 62 On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 6:46 AM, kernelci.org bot wrote: > acs5k_defconfig (arm) — PASS, 0 errors, 2 warnings, 0 section mismatches > > Warnings: > :1328:2: warning: #warning syscall arch_prctl not implemented [-Wcpp] > :1328:2: warning: #warning syscall arch_prctl not implemented [-Wcpp] patch sent today, we don't really want this syscall except on x86 > allmodconfig (arm64) — FAIL, 6 errors, 5 warnings, 0 section mismatches > > Errors: > ERROR (phandle_references): Reference to non-existent node or label "pwm_f_clk_pins" > ERROR (phandle_references): Reference to non-existent node or label "pwm_ao_a_3_pins" > ERROR: Input tree has errors, aborting (use -f to force output) > ERROR (phandle_references): Reference to non-existent node or label "pwm_f_clk_pins" > ERROR (phandle_references): Reference to non-existent node or label "pwm_ao_a_3_pins" > ERROR: Input tree has errors, aborting (use -f to force output) Kevin has already backed out the commit that caused this. > Warnings: > :1325:2: warning: #warning syscall statx not implemented [-Wcpp] Should get fixed in the next few days when the patch gets picked up for arm64. > drivers/misc/aspeed-lpc-ctrl.c:232:17: warning: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'resource_size_t {aka long long unsigned int}' [-Wformat=] patch sent today > include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:32:26: warning: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Woverflow] > include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:32:26: warning: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Woverflow] I sent this one a few days ago > allmodconfig (x86) — PASS, 0 errors, 11 warnings, 0 section mismatches > > Warnings: > drivers/crypto/cavium/zip/zip_main.c:489:18: warning: format '%ld' expects argument of type 'long int', but argument 4 has type 'long long int' [-Wformat=] > drivers/crypto/cavium/zip/zip_main.c:489:18: warning: format '%ld' expects argument of type 'long int', but argument 5 has type 'long long int' [-Wformat=] This one too. > cavium_octeon_defconfig (mips) — FAIL, 830 errors, 3 warnings, 0 section mismatches > > Errors: > arch/mips/include/asm/octeon/cvmx-mio-defs.h:78:3: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before '__BITFIELD_FIELD' > arch/mips/include/asm/octeon/cvmx-mio-defs.h:95:3: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before '__BITFIELD_FIELD' Maybe caused by 4cd156de2ca8 ("MIPS: Octeon: Remove unused MIO types and macros.") I have not looked in detail > net/bridge/br_netlink.c:1339:1: warning: the frame size of 2544 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=] > net/wireless/nl80211.c:1399:1: warning: the frame size of 2208 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=] > net/wireless/nl80211.c:1888:1: warning: the frame size of 3840 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=] > net/wireless/nl80211.c:4429:1: warning: the frame size of 2240 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=] Still need to rework my patches. Arnd