Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754012AbdCWScv (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:32:51 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:43560 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751314AbdCWSct (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:32:49 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Rob Herring Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 13:32:24 -0500 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Query on DT overlay support. To: Nava kishore Manne Cc: "frowand.list@gmail.com" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Srinivas Goud Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 744 Lines: 26 On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Nava kishore Manne wrote: > Hi, > > > > This mail is regarding the DT overlay support in the Linux > kernel > > I am able to make the device-tree overlay work out of box by > using my own dtc complier (I mean I used the dtc compiler > > Available here > http://www.embedded-things.com/bbb/patching-the-device-tree-compiler-for-ubuntu/ > ) > > When can I expect the same changes in the scripts/dtc in > mainline???? > > In case of any support needed for testing I can help on > testing the same I works in Xilinx and we had a lot of combinations to test > overlay J It's already there. Landed in 4.11. Rob