Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756760AbdCXIoJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2017 04:44:09 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:48912 "EHLO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751584AbdCXIn5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2017 04:43:57 -0400 X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: BgH5H6MPP5U6ztuge4qXsd8lNOxCO3M90F5P1OrvQgOs 1490345035 Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 09:43:41 +0100 From: Greg KH To: "Pranay Kr. Srivastava" Cc: w.d.hubbs@gmail.com, chris@the-brannons.com, kirk@reisers.ca, samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, speakup@linux-speakup.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [[RESEND]PATCH staging/speakup v3 3/3] use speakup_allocate as per required context Message-ID: <20170324084341.GA10793@kroah.com> References: <20170323131737.GA13629@kroah.com> <20170324083711.7920-1-pranjas@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170324083711.7920-1-pranjas@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 403 Lines: 16 On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 02:07:11PM +0530, Pranay Kr. Srivastava wrote: > speakup_allocate used GFP_ATOMIC for allocations > even while during initialization due to it's use > in notifier call. Is that a problem? > Pass GFP_ flags as well to speakup_allocate depending > on the context it is called in. At init, we should be fine to use GFP_ATOMIC, so is this change really needed? thanks, greg k-h