Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263591AbTE0OA2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2003 10:00:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263610AbTE0OA2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2003 10:00:28 -0400 Received: from smtp.inet.fi ([192.89.123.192]:5857 "EHLO smtp.inet.fi") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263591AbTE0OA1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2003 10:00:27 -0400 From: Kimmo Sundqvist Organization: Unorganized To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.4.20-ck7] good compressed caching experience Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 17:13:48 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 References: <200305262150.04552.rabbit80@mbnet.fi> <200305270711.34608.kernel@kolivas.org> In-Reply-To: <200305270711.34608.kernel@kolivas.org> Cc: rcastro@ime.usp.br, Con Kolivas MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200305271713.49762.rabbit80@mbnet.fi> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1615 Lines: 36 On Tuesday 27 May 2003 00:11, Con Kolivas wrote: > On Tue, 27 May 2003 04:50, Kimmo Sundqvist wrote: > > Just a warning... both systems have only ReiserFS partitions. Other FSes > > might still get hurt. > This is definitely the case! If you try out compressed caching with ck7 > please do not enable preempt if you are using ext2/3 or vfat. Is this a problem in ext2/3, pre-empt implementation, compressed caching or kernel in general? I think I can still choose between compression methods, or can I? Which one of them, on average, is the least CPU-intensive, and which one gives the best compression ratio? I am also at loss how to interpret the percentages in "cat /proc/comp_cache_stat". For M$ Windows there was once a program called MagnaRAM97 that had a similar idea, but I don't understand how it could report 2 to 3-fold compression ratios. It always spontaneously rebooted the Pentium 133MHz after some hours, so I uninstalled it. Just take your time, but will we see a pre-empt safe (or better yet SMP safe) version coming out anytime soon? Compiling another 2.4.20-ck7 with 8kB pages and swap compression in the background. I have now "mem=896M" to avoid the highmem boundary, even if it wasn't necessary. Someone said somewhere that a 1GB system is faster without highmem support, so I haven't compiled it in for a while. -Kimmo S. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/