Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756528AbdCXVfA (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2017 17:35:00 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:53896 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751407AbdCXVev (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2017 17:34:51 -0400 Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 16:34:45 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Christian =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6nig?= Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] PCI: add functionality for resizing resources v2 Message-ID: <20170324213445.GF25380@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com> References: <1489408896-25039-1-git-send-email-deathsimple@vodafone.de> <1489408896-25039-3-git-send-email-deathsimple@vodafone.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1489408896-25039-3-git-send-email-deathsimple@vodafone.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 7445 Lines: 222 On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 01:41:34PM +0100, Christian K?nig wrote: > From: Christian K?nig > > This allows device drivers to request resizing their BARs. > > The function only tries to reprogram the windows of the bridge directly above > the requesting device and only the BAR of the same type (usually mem, 64bit, > prefetchable). This is done to make sure not to disturb other drivers by > changing the BARs of their devices. > > If reprogramming the bridge BAR fails the old status is restored and -ENOSPC > returned to the calling device driver. > > v2: rebase on changes in rbar support > > Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig > --- > drivers/pci/setup-bus.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/pci/setup-res.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/pci.h | 2 ++ > 3 files changed, 114 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c > index f30ca75..cfab2c7 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/setup-bus.c > @@ -1923,6 +1923,67 @@ void pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(struct pci_dev *bridge) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources); > > +int pci_reassign_bridge_resources(struct pci_dev *bridge, unsigned long type) > +{ > + const unsigned long type_mask = IORESOURCE_IO | IORESOURCE_MEM | > + IORESOURCE_PREFETCH | IORESOURCE_MEM_64; > + > + struct resource saved; > + LIST_HEAD(add_list); > + LIST_HEAD(fail_head); > + struct pci_dev_resource *fail_res; > + unsigned i; > + int ret = 0; > + > + /* Release all children from the matching bridge resource */ > + for (i = PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES; i < PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCE_END; ++i) { Nit: use post-increment unless you need pre-increment. > + struct resource *res = &bridge->resource[i]; > + > + if ((res->flags & type_mask) != (type & type_mask)) > + continue; > + > + saved = *res; > + if (res->parent) { > + release_child_resources(res); Doesn't this recursively release *all* child resources? There could be BARs from several devices, or even windows of downstream bridges, inside this window. The drivers of those other devices aren't expecting things to change here. > + release_resource(res); > + } > + res->start = 0; > + res->end = 0; > + break; > + } > + > + if (i == PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCE_END) > + return -ENOENT; > + > + __pci_bus_size_bridges(bridge->subordinate, &add_list); > + __pci_bridge_assign_resources(bridge, &add_list, &fail_head); > + BUG_ON(!list_empty(&add_list)); > + > + /* restore size and flags */ > + list_for_each_entry(fail_res, &fail_head, list) { > + struct resource *res = fail_res->res; > + > + res->start = fail_res->start; > + res->end = fail_res->end; > + res->flags = fail_res->flags; > + } > + > + /* Revert to the old configuration */ > + if (!list_empty(&fail_head)) { > + struct resource *res = &bridge->resource[i]; > + > + res->start = saved.start; > + res->end = saved.end; > + res->flags = saved.flags; > + > + pci_claim_resource(bridge, i); > + ret = -ENOSPC; > + } > + > + free_list(&fail_head); > + return ret; > +} > + > void pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(struct pci_bus *bus) > { > struct pci_dev *dev; > diff --git a/drivers/pci/setup-res.c b/drivers/pci/setup-res.c > index 9526e34..3bb1e29 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/setup-res.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/setup-res.c > @@ -363,6 +363,57 @@ int pci_reassign_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, int resno, resource_size_t addsiz > return 0; > } > > +int pci_resize_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, int resno, int size) > +{ > + struct resource *res = dev->resource + resno; > + u32 sizes = pci_rbar_get_possible_sizes(dev, resno); > + int old = pci_rbar_get_current_size(dev, resno); > + u64 bytes = 1ULL << (size + 20); > + int ret = 0; I think we should fail the request if the device is enabled, i.e., if the PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY bit is set. We can't safely change the BAR while memory decoding is enabled. I know there's code in pci_std_update_resource() that turns off PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY, but I think that's a mistake: I think it should fail when asked to update an enabled BAR the same way pci_iov_update_resource() does. I'm not sure why you call pci_reenable_device() below, but I think I would rather have the driver do something like this: pci_disable_device(dev); pci_resize_resource(dev, 0, size); pci_enable_device(dev); That way it's very clear to the driver that it must re-read all BARs after resizing this one. > + if (!sizes) > + return -ENOTSUPP; > + > + if (!(sizes & (1 << size))) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + if (old < 0) > + return old; > + > + /* Make sure the resource isn't assigned before making it larger. */ > + if (resource_size(res) < bytes && res->parent) { > + release_resource(res); > + res->end = resource_size(res) - 1; > + res->start = 0; > + if (resno < PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES) > + pci_update_resource(dev, resno); Why do we need to write this zero to the BAR? If PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY is set, I think this is dangerous, and if it's not set, I think it's unnecessary. I think we should set the IORESOURCE_UNSET bit to indicate that the resource does not have an address assigned to it. It should get cleared later anyway, but having IORESOURCE_UNSET will make any debug messages emitted while reassigning resources make more sense. > + } > + > + ret = pci_rbar_set_size(dev, resno, size); > + if (ret) > + goto error_reassign; > + > + res->end = res->start + bytes - 1; > + > + ret = pci_reassign_bridge_resources(dev->bus->self, res->flags); > + if (ret) > + goto error_resize; > + > + pci_reenable_device(dev->bus->self); > + return 0; > + > +error_resize: > + pci_rbar_set_size(dev, resno, old); > + res->end = res->start + (1ULL << (old + 20)) - 1; > + > +error_reassign: > + pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(dev->bus); > + pci_setup_bridge(dev->bus); Could this bridge-related recovery code go inside pci_reassign_bridge_resources()? > + pci_reenable_device(dev->bus->self); > + return ret; > +} > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_resize_resource); > + > int pci_enable_resources(struct pci_dev *dev, int mask) > { > u16 cmd, old_cmd; > diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h > index 6954e50..8eaebb4 100644 > --- a/include/linux/pci.h > +++ b/include/linux/pci.h > @@ -1055,6 +1055,7 @@ void pci_reset_bridge_secondary_bus(struct pci_dev *dev); > void pci_update_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, int resno); > int __must_check pci_assign_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, int i); > int __must_check pci_reassign_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, int i, resource_size_t add_size, resource_size_t align); > +int __must_check pci_resize_resource(struct pci_dev *dev, int i, int size); > int pci_select_bars(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned long flags); > bool pci_device_is_present(struct pci_dev *pdev); > void pci_ignore_hotplug(struct pci_dev *dev); > @@ -1135,6 +1136,7 @@ void pci_assign_unassigned_resources(void); > void pci_assign_unassigned_bridge_resources(struct pci_dev *bridge); > void pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(struct pci_bus *bus); > void pci_assign_unassigned_root_bus_resources(struct pci_bus *bus); > +int pci_reassign_bridge_resources(struct pci_dev *bridge, unsigned long type); > void pdev_enable_device(struct pci_dev *); > int pci_enable_resources(struct pci_dev *, int mask); > void pci_fixup_irqs(u8 (*)(struct pci_dev *, u8 *), > -- > 2.7.4 >