Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936600AbdCYABZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2017 20:01:25 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f173.google.com ([209.85.192.173]:36655 "EHLO mail-pf0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933480AbdCYABS (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2017 20:01:18 -0400 Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 09:00:05 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Sebastian Ott , Sergey Senozhatsky , Petr Mladek , Heiko Carstens , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: lockdep warning: console vs. mem hotplug Message-ID: <20170325000005.GC6356@tigerII.localdomain> References: <20170324123933.78f9c125@gandalf.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170324123933.78f9c125@gandalf.local.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 350 Lines: 13 Hello, On (03/24/17 12:39), Steven Rostedt wrote: [..] > Is there a stack trace of where the lockdep dump happened? That is > useful too. Otherwise we don't see where the inverse happened. Steven, isn't it the inversion I describe in [1] (after the first lockdep warning)? [1] lkml.kernel.org/r/20170321044421.GB448@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain -ss