Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263928AbTE0QXV (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2003 12:23:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263930AbTE0QXV (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2003 12:23:21 -0400 Received: from auemail1.lucent.com ([192.11.223.161]:50866 "EHLO auemail1.firewall.lucent.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263928AbTE0QXU (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2003 12:23:20 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16083.37850.528654.94908@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 12:35:38 -0400 From: "John Stoffel" To: William Lee Irwin III Cc: John Stoffel , DevilKin-LKML , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.5.70 compile error In-Reply-To: <20030527155259.GK8978@holomorphy.com> References: <200305271048.36495.devilkin-lkml@blindguardian.org> <20030527130515.GH8978@holomorphy.com> <200305271729.49047.devilkin-lkml@blindguardian.org> <20030527153619.GJ8978@holomorphy.com> <16083.35048.737099.575241@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20030527155259.GK8978@holomorphy.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.14 under Emacs 20.6.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1824 Lines: 37 >>>>> "William" == William Lee Irwin writes: William> On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 11:48:56AM -0400, John Stoffel wrote: >> Subarchitecture Type (PC-compatible, Voyager (NCR), NUMAQ (IBM/Sequent), Summit/EXA (IBM x440), Support for other sub-arch SMP systems with more than 8 CPUs, SGI 320/540 (Visual Workstation), Generic architecture (Summit, bigsmp, default)) [PC-compatible] (NEW) >> What the hell am I supposed to enter here? This is just friggin ugly >> and un-readable. It should be cleaned up. Or is it just that the >> help entry is appended to the question improperly here? That's sorta >> what it looks like peering at it with my head turned to the left all >> the way. William> If you don't know, then just hit "enter". Sure, I understand that, but what I'm really complaining about is the text of the prompt. When I do a 'make menuconfig' it's alot cleaner and more understandable what's happening here. Part of the problem is the specification in arch/i386/Kconfig, which I think needs to be re-worked. In my case, I specified that the max number of CPUS is 2, since I only have a dual CPU box. So it's not a BIGCPU box. Not sure how to make this change... I'll have to find some time and play with this. William> Yes, they're mutually exclusive. You can't build one that William> will run on all those machines because the programming isn't William> done right for that. But the generic architecture option William> will run on at least 3. I see that when I dod the menuconfig, it's not clear at all when running oldconfig. John - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/