Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751892AbdC0DCV (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Mar 2017 23:02:21 -0400 Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]:10744 "EHLO wolverine01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751811AbdC0DCN (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Mar 2017 23:02:13 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,229,1486454400"; d="scan'208";a="272894311" X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5800,7501,8479"; a="1335026276" X-MGA-submission: =?us-ascii?q?MDF2iLzcJvhI4Pz+1qKs8FKbqFaBI9GCWQN2dm?= =?us-ascii?q?tE6KGbNKJ56PMf368YRwNiX22I/ikWQIYDaRCwkfgCVReJ3bRWpBSZVI?= =?us-ascii?q?o3Hskfjm4Bd4UReOG+FvyoZPGmx97c9vcH9oZhBqxnkAZWse3OATdoLh?= =?us-ascii?q?Rj?= From: Joseph Chang To: "minyard@acm.org" , "openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" CC: Jiandi An , Joeseph Chang Subject: RE: [PATCH] ipmi: Fix kernel panic at ipmi_ssif_thread() Thread-Topic: [PATCH] ipmi: Fix kernel panic at ipmi_ssif_thread() Thread-Index: AQHSo6Qo3kSpT1Y4YkarxbMXnYtfsKGkWIIAgAOpNdA= Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 03:02:08 +0000 Message-ID: <2cfb127c8f264e10a88b43bd74883c6b@aptaiexm02a.ap.qualcomm.com> References: <1490252832-20381-1-git-send-email-joechang@qti.qualcomm.com> <6d686ff9-e94b-ddc0-cf9f-13a839acbb08@acm.org> In-Reply-To: <6d686ff9-e94b-ddc0-cf9f-13a839acbb08@acm.org> Accept-Language: zh-TW, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.249.136.10] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.home.local id v2R32q68030493 Content-Length: 5280 Lines: 143 Hi Corey, Thanks your feedback and suggestion. :) I think you are right. It is better to allocate one new local variable to store i2c data and size to be send... I create new patch in following according to your suggestion. Could you help to review the patch again? >From eec31f51acc7e019fd0dcc512febda86870268d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joeseph Chang Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 10:46:42 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] ipmi: Fix kernel panic at ipmi_ssif_thread() msg_written_handler() may set ssif_info->multi_data to NULL when using ipmitool to write fru. Fix kernel panic at ipmi_ssif_thread() and incorrect ssif_info->multi_pos by adding one local pointer i2c_data to store i2c data and size to send before calling ssif_i2c_send(). With this change, can avoid concurrent access to ssif_info->multi_pos and ssif_info->multi_data at msg_written_handler. Because msg_written_handler can be called at any time after ssif_i2c_send(). --- drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) mode change 100644 => 100755 drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c old mode 100644 new mode 100755 index cca6e5b..f36f018 --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c @@ -852,6 +852,7 @@ static void msg_written_handler(struct ssif_info *ssif_info, int result, unsigned char *data, unsigned int len) { int rv; + unsigned char *i2c_data; /* We are single-threaded here, so no need for a lock. */ if (result < 0) { @@ -899,6 +900,7 @@ static void msg_written_handler(struct ssif_info *ssif_info, int result, left = 32; /* Length byte. */ ssif_info->multi_data[ssif_info->multi_pos] = left; + i2c_data = ssif_info->multi_data + ssif_info->multi_pos; ssif_info->multi_pos += left; if (left < 32) /* @@ -912,7 +914,7 @@ static void msg_written_handler(struct ssif_info *ssif_info, int result, rv = ssif_i2c_send(ssif_info, msg_written_handler, I2C_SMBUS_WRITE, SSIF_IPMI_MULTI_PART_REQUEST_MIDDLE, - ssif_info->multi_data + ssif_info->multi_pos, + i2c_data, I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_DATA); if (rv < 0) { /* request failed, just return the error. */ -- 1.9.1 Thank you, Joseph. -----Original Message----- From: Corey Minyard [mailto:tcminyard@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Corey Minyard Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2017 10:53 AM To: Joseph Chang ; openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jiandi An ; Joeseph Chang Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipmi: Fix kernel panic at ipmi_ssif_thread() This is incorrect. These values *must* be set before ssif_i2c_send() is done. Once ssif_i2c_send() is called, msg_written_handler can be called at any time after that, including before where you moved the new code. If I understand this correctly, I think you need to add a variable, maybe named "bytes_to_write" and do bytes_to_write = ssif_info->multi_data + ssif_info->multi_pos; before the comparison and pass bytes_to_write into ssif_i2c_send(). Thanks, -corey On 03/23/2017 02:07 AM, Joeseph Chang wrote: > From: Joeseph Chang > > msg_written_handler() may set ssif_info->multi_data to NULL when using > ipmitool to write fru. > Change the ssif i2c send data sequence in msg_written_handler() to fix > NULL pointer kernel panic and incorrect ssif_info->multi_pos. > > Signed-off-by: Joeseph Chang > --- > drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c | 20 +++++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c > b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c index cca6e5b..39346ee 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c > +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c > @@ -899,21 +899,13 @@ static void msg_written_handler(struct ssif_info *ssif_info, int result, > left = 32; > /* Length byte. */ > ssif_info->multi_data[ssif_info->multi_pos] = left; > - ssif_info->multi_pos += left; > - if (left < 32) > - /* > - * Write is finished. Note that we must end > - * with a write of less than 32 bytes to > - * complete the transaction, even if it is > - * zero bytes. > - */ > - ssif_info->multi_data = NULL; > > rv = ssif_i2c_send(ssif_info, msg_written_handler, > I2C_SMBUS_WRITE, > SSIF_IPMI_MULTI_PART_REQUEST_MIDDLE, > ssif_info->multi_data + ssif_info->multi_pos, > I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_DATA); > + > if (rv < 0) { > /* request failed, just return the error. */ > ssif_inc_stat(ssif_info, send_errors); @@ -922,6 +914,16 @@ > static void msg_written_handler(struct ssif_info *ssif_info, int result, > pr_info("Error from i2c_non_blocking_op(3)\n"); > msg_done_handler(ssif_info, -EIO, NULL, 0); > } > + > + ssif_info->multi_pos += left; > + if (left < 32) > + /* > + * Write is finished. Note that we must end > + * with a write of less than 32 bytes to > + * complete the transaction, even if it is > + * zero bytes. > + */ > + ssif_info->multi_data = NULL; > } else { > /* Ready to request the result. */ > unsigned long oflags, *flags;