Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752057AbdC0GXt (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Mar 2017 02:23:49 -0400 Received: from mail-pg0-f68.google.com ([74.125.83.68]:36524 "EHLO mail-pg0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751465AbdC0GXo (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Mar 2017 02:23:44 -0400 From: Wanpeng Li X-Google-Original-From: Wanpeng Li To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: Paolo Bonzini , =?UTF-8?q?Radim=20Kr=C4=8Dm=C3=A1=C5=99?= , Wanpeng Li , Dmitry Vyukov , Alex Williamson , "# v3 . 10+" Subject: [PATCH] KVM: mmu: Fix overlap with private memslots Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 23:23:20 -0700 Message-Id: <1490595800-15060-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3275 Lines: 109 From: Wanpeng Li Reported by syzkaller: pte_list_remove: ffff9714eb1f8078 0->BUG ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c:1157! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP RIP: 0010:pte_list_remove+0x11b/0x120 [kvm] Call Trace: drop_spte+0x83/0xb0 [kvm] mmu_page_zap_pte+0xcc/0xe0 [kvm] kvm_mmu_prepare_zap_page+0x81/0x4a0 [kvm] kvm_mmu_invalidate_zap_all_pages+0x159/0x220 [kvm] kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all+0xe/0x10 [kvm] kvm_mmu_notifier_release+0x6c/0xa0 [kvm] ? kvm_mmu_notifier_release+0x5/0xa0 [kvm] __mmu_notifier_release+0x79/0x110 ? __mmu_notifier_release+0x5/0x110 exit_mmap+0x15a/0x170 ? do_exit+0x281/0xcb0 mmput+0x66/0x160 do_exit+0x2c9/0xcb0 ? __context_tracking_exit.part.5+0x4a/0x150 do_group_exit+0x50/0xd0 SyS_exit_group+0x14/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x73/0x1f0 entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25 The reason is that when creates new memslot, there is no guarantee for new memslot not overlap with private memslots. This can be triggered by the following program: #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include long r[16]; int main() { void *p = valloc(0x4000); r[2] = open("/dev/kvm", 0); r[3] = ioctl(r[2], KVM_CREATE_VM, 0x0ul); uint64_t addr = 0xf000; ioctl(r[3], KVM_SET_IDENTITY_MAP_ADDR, &addr); r[6] = ioctl(r[3], KVM_CREATE_VCPU, 0x0ul); ioctl(r[3], KVM_SET_TSS_ADDR, 0x0ul); ioctl(r[6], KVM_RUN, 0); ioctl(r[6], KVM_RUN, 0); struct kvm_userspace_memory_region mr = { .slot = 0, .flags = KVM_MEM_LOG_DIRTY_PAGES, .guest_phys_addr = 0xf000, .memory_size = 0x4000, .userspace_addr = (uintptr_t) p }; ioctl(r[3], KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION, &mr); return 0; } This bug is caused by 'commit 5419369ed6bd ("KVM: Fix user memslot overlap check")' which removes the check to avoid to add new memslot who overlaps with private memslots. This patch fixes it by not add new memslot if it is also overlap with private memslots. Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Radim Krčmář Cc: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Alex Williamson Cc: # v3.10+ Fixes: 5419369ed (KVM: Fix user memslot overlap check) Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li --- virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c index a17d787..ddeb18a 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c @@ -978,8 +978,7 @@ int __kvm_set_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm, /* Check for overlaps */ r = -EEXIST; kvm_for_each_memslot(slot, __kvm_memslots(kvm, as_id)) { - if ((slot->id >= KVM_USER_MEM_SLOTS) || - (slot->id == id)) + if (slot->id == id) continue; if (!((base_gfn + npages <= slot->base_gfn) || (base_gfn >= slot->base_gfn + slot->npages))) -- 2.7.4