Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752128AbdC0TFP (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:05:15 -0400 Received: from mail-ot0-f182.google.com ([74.125.82.182]:33882 "EHLO mail-ot0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751729AbdC0TFJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:05:09 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Paul Moore Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:05:07 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Audit fixes for v4.11 (#1) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Dmitry Vyukov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1155 Lines: 27 On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 8:18 AM, Paul Moore wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 6:23 PM, Linus Torvalds >> wrote: >>> The whole reason for that inlined part, and the uninlined >>> __audit_signal_info() helper was that the code *used* to be able to >>> avoid a function call entirely. That reason is now gone. >> >> Agreed. Normally I would say let's just fix it in audit/next and I'll >> send it to you during the next merge window; however, since we're >> breaking the whole point of this inline in the -rcX stage, and the >> uninline'ing patch would be rather trivial, would you prefer I send it >> to you now for v4.11? > > It's fine if it does into some "next" branch for 4.12, I don't think > there is any hurry as long as this gets fixed eventually. > > But I'll take the obvious cleanup for 4.11 too if you end up having > other things coming my way. Okay, sounds good. I'll work on it this week, assuming nothing blows up in the process expect to see it later this week. -- paul moore security @ redhat