Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264127AbTE0UPB (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2003 16:15:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264134AbTE0UPB (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2003 16:15:01 -0400 Received: from lindsey.linux-systeme.com ([80.190.48.67]:50694 "EHLO mx00.linux-systeme.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264127AbTE0UO7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2003 16:14:59 -0400 From: Marc-Christian Petersen Organization: Working Overloaded Linux Kernel To: Andrea Arcangeli , manish Subject: Re: 2.4.20: Proccess stuck in __lock_page ... Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 22:25:27 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger , Christian Klose , William Lee Irwin III References: <3ED2DE86.2070406@storadinc.com> <3ED3BDCE.4010200@storadinc.com> <20030527202047.GM3767@dualathlon.random> In-Reply-To: <20030527202047.GM3767@dualathlon.random> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200305272225.27720.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1274 Lines: 37 On Tuesday 27 May 2003 22:20, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: Hi Andrea, > > 1. Stock 2.4.20 > > 2. 2.4.20 with the io_request_lock removed. > > The tests on the first one are still going. The tests on the second one > > showed processes getting stuck for long times (> 5 minutes) and not > > paused ... > sorry if it's a dumb question but what is the "io_request_lock removed" > thing? Hope you didn't delete any io_request_lock, if you did you can > get worse things than crashes (i.e. mm/fs corruption). the pausing bug > was a genuine race (quite innocent, if you could trigger a disk unplug > you could recover from it) > > Andrea funny. I asked him the same ;) see his response: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- >what is this io_request_lock patch you are talking about? > >ciao, Marc > We made some changes to the 2.4.20 kernel to remove the io_request_lock and replace with queue_lock and host_lock. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ciao, Marc - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/