Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264180AbTE0VN6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2003 17:13:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264177AbTE0VNw (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2003 17:13:52 -0400 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:59129 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264189AbTE0VMM (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 May 2003 17:12:12 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 17:25:25 -0400 From: Pete Zaitcev Message-Id: <200305272125.h4RLPPl18360@devserv.devel.redhat.com> To: Ricky Beam cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.5.70 In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 757 Lines: 17 >[...] > Take a look at the number of arch's that haven't seen much testing (and > in many respects are thus broken)... does anyone have a functional 2.5.70 > sparc64 kernel? I've built several but they're all too big to be booted > (i.e. over 3.5M, and yes, I've turned off everything possible.) The topic of architectures being behind was discussed in the context of AKPM's must-fix list, before Hanna's #lse call. The decision is to go ahead with first tier architectures only. Please deal with it. -- Pete - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/