Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 19:28:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 19:27:58 -0500 Received: from gap.cco.caltech.edu ([131.215.139.43]:11218 "EHLO gap.cco.caltech.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 19:27:41 -0500 Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 00:59:27 +0100 From: David Weinehall To: Michael Rothwell Cc: wnoise@ugcs.caltech.edu, mlist-linux-kernel@nntp-server.caltech.edu Subject: Re: working userspace nfs v3 for linux? Message-ID: <20001102005927.A26355@khan.acc.umu.se> In-Reply-To: <3A00A84E.F3A1C585@holly-springs.nc.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <3A00A84E.F3A1C585@holly-springs.nc.us>; from rothwell@holly-springs.nc.us on Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 06:33:34PM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 06:33:34PM -0500, Michael Rothwell wrote: > Aaron Denney wrote: > > I am not aware of any userspace NFSv3 server. Your best bet would > > probably to take the v2 server and mutate it. Why do you want this beast? > > So I can use Linux rather than Solaris 7 and the Solstice Disk Suite, > which performs like crap thanks to UFS, and the Linux NFS v2 > implementation. Yes, but why do you need a userspace NFSv3 server? v2.2.18 will contain knfsdv3, shouldn't this be good enough? /David Weinehall _ _ // David Weinehall /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker // Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/