Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932092AbdC1O3U (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:29:20 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f50.google.com ([209.85.214.50]:38143 "EHLO mail-it0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752594AbdC1O3R (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:29:17 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170328130552.GA8643@leverpostej> References: <20170321163122.9183-1-fu.wei@linaro.org> <1cc5a994-0af6-79ea-930d-44b3fc789427@jonmasters.org> <20170328130552.GA8643@leverpostej> From: Fu Wei Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 22:29:10 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v22 00/11] acpi, clocksource: add GTDT driver and GTDT support in arm_arch_timer To: Mark Rutland Cc: Jon Masters , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Daniel Lezcano , Thomas Gleixner , Marc Zyngier , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Sudeep Holla , Hanjun Guo , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Linaro ACPI Mailman List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , ACPI Devel Maling List , rruigrok@codeaurora.org, "Abdulhamid, Harb" , Christopher Covington , Timur Tabi , G Gregory , Al Stone , Jon Masters , Wei Huang , Arnd Bergmann , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Suravee Suthikulpanit , Leo Duran , Wim Van Sebroeck , Guenter Roeck , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, Tomasz Nowicki , Christoffer Dall , Julien Grall Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1753 Lines: 54 Hi Mark, On 28 March 2017 at 21:05, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 08:34:12PM +0800, Fu Wei wrote: >> Hi Jon, >> >> Thanks for your email >> An hour ago, I just got some feedback from Lorenzo, will update my >> patchset ASAP according to his suggestion. >> >> But I still need some feedback form Mark, I can see some progress here: >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git/log/?h=arch-timer/gtdt >> >> I guess I should rebase my patchset to his gtdt branch for v23. >> >> So now, I am waiting for Mark's feedback to move on. > > Sorry for the delay; I have not had the time to focus on this as I would > like to. I'm happy with patches 1-4, but from patch 5 onwards, there's > one change I'd like to see. > > I'd prefer that mmio timer frame rame N was always stored at > arch_timer_mem::frame[N], rather than arch_timer_mem::frame[] being in > an arbitrary order. That will make arch_timer_mem_frame::frame_nr > redundant. > > To allow arch_timer_mem::frame[] this to be sparse, I'm happy to have a > bool arch_timer_mem_frame::valid field that we set when probing each > frame. Then we don't need arch_timer_mem::num_frames. > > This will make iterating over the frames far less confusing, and makes > it simple to detect when a frame number is erroneously reused. > > Otherwise, I'm largely happy to pick the rest and apply any fixups > myself. Great thanks for your feedback! I will follow your suggestion to improve my patches, then post it in a day. So I will rebase my patchset on arch-timer/gtdt branch of your REPO https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git/log/?h=arch-timer/gtdt > > Thanks, > Mark. -- Best regards, Fu Wei Software Engineer Red Hat