Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753813AbdC1O4C (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:56:02 -0400 Received: from mail-wr0-f193.google.com ([209.85.128.193]:33364 "EHLO mail-wr0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752138AbdC1Ozg (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2017 10:55:36 -0400 From: Christian Lamparter To: Alban Cc: QCA ath9k Development , John Crispin , Kalle Valo , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, m@kresin.me Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] Documentation: dt: net: Update the ath9k binding for SoC devices Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:53:32 +0200 Message-ID: <2357006.NGKQYCh4BG@debian64> User-Agent: KMail/5.2.3 (Linux/4.11.0-rc1-wt-only+; KDE/5.28.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20170328104441.5feedcf4@avionic-0020> References: <1489439116-4233-1-git-send-email-albeu@free.fr> <1897671.fKa4XTnU1K@debian64> <20170328104441.5feedcf4@avionic-0020> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 5382 Lines: 119 On Tuesday, March 28, 2017 10:44:41 AM CEST Alban wrote: > On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 18:11:15 +0200 > Christian Lamparter wrote: > > > On Monday, March 13, 2017 10:05:09 PM CEST Alban wrote: > > > The current binding only cover PCI devices so extend it for SoC devices. > > > > > > Most SoC platforms use an MTD partition for the calibration data > > > instead of an EEPROM. The qca,no-eeprom property was added to allow > > > loading the EEPROM content using firmware loading. This new binding > > > replace this hack with NVMEM cells, so we also mark the qca,no-eeprom > > > property as deprecated in case anyone ever used it. > > > > Please don't mark "qca,no-eeprom" as deprecated then. > > If some devices geniously need to rely on userspace for extracting > > and processing the calibration data, it should be stay a > > optional properties. > > Deprecated just mean that it shouldn't be used for new devices. > But as it is not used by any board, misuse the firmware loading API and > firmware loader user helper are deprecated in udev, I find we could also > just drop it. But LEDE/OpenWRT rely on the firmware loading API more than ever and currently there is not a replacement for it. From what I know, Luis tried to replace it with his sysdata approach: however, this was disliked by Greg KH and Linus for the following reasons. : |So I absolutely abhor "changes for changes sake". | |If the existing code works for existing drivers, let them keep it. | |And if a new interface is truly more flexible, then it should be able |to implement the old interface with no changes, so that drivers |shouldn't need to be changed/upgraded. | |Then, drivers that actually _want_ new features, or that can take |advantage of new interfaces to actually make things *simpler*, can |choose to make those changes. But those changes should have real |advantages. |[...] your nvmem approach would need to be as universal and powerful as the "qca,no-eeprom" + userspace solutions in order to deprecate it. > > For example: A device that can't do easily without "qca,no-eeprom" is > > the AVM FRITZ!WLAN Repeater 300E. For this device, the caldata > > is stored in the flash, however for whatever reason the vendor > > choose to "reverse" it. (like completely back to front, not byteswapped > > or something). So an extra "unreversing step" is required. So, it would > > require some sort of a special nvmem-provider-processor as an > > alternative. > > Or just handle this special eeprom format in the ath9k driver. I doubt > that this case is so common that it would justify adding a whole new > layer to nvmem. Well, you'll have to deal with it in nvmem, if you want it to deprecate "qca,no-eeprom". I looked into 10-ath9k-eeprom [0] of LEDE's AR71XX target and I noticed that quite a few devices patch the MACs of the wifi. If you look at the code for the Airtight C-55 and C-60, Meraki MR18, Meraki Z1, you'll notice that each one has to add a fixed value (+1, +2, ...) to the extraced MAC-Address. So how would you replicate this, with "nvmem-cell-names = address" without some sort of nvmem-provider-processor? Also, there's another usecase of a nvmem-provider-processor. For example, one could be convert all the different types of ascii-macs (Either strings like "00:11:22:33:44:55", "00.11.22.33..." or "00112233..." ) to their binary representation. For AR71XX, this is mostly done by ath79_parse_ascii_mac: https://github.com/lede-project/source/blob/master/target/linux/ar71xx/files/arch/mips/ath79/dev-eth.c#L1204 and grep lists the following devices: mach-dgl-5500-a1.c, mach-dhp-1565-a1.c, mach-dir-505-a1.c, mach-dir-615-c1.c mach-dir-615-i1.c, mach-dir-825-b1.c, mach-dir-825-c1.c, mach-tew-673gru.c mach-tew-712br.c, mach-tew-732br.c, mach-tew-823dru.c I did a quick check: All of them use the extracted MACs for ath9k and/or ethernet. Note: I think Ralink/MediaTek will have the same issues. > > > Optional properties: > > > +- mac-address: See ethernet.txt in the parent directory > > > +- local-mac-address: See ethernet.txt in the parent directory > > > [...] > > > + > > > +Deprecated properties: > > > - qca,no-eeprom: Indicates that there is no physical EEPROM > > > connected to the ath9k wireless chip (in this case the calibration / > > > EEPROM data will be loaded from userspace > > > using the kernel firmware loader). > > > -- mac-address: See ethernet.txt in the parent directory > > > -- local-mac-address: See ethernet.txt in the parent directory > > > - > > It sounds like you want to deprecate mac-address and > > local-mac-address as well. If so you sould add this to the commit as > > well. From my point of view, people mostly flat-out patched the > > eeprom-image if they wanted to set the mac-address. However, this was > > an extra step, if nvmem does away with it, I'm completely fine with > > deprecating these properties. > > The produced diff is very misleading because the mac-address properties > get lumped with the other new optional properties. But if you look > closely it just move qca,no-eeprom to the deprecated section. Yes ok. This is the case. Thanks, Christian [0]