Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753820AbdC1Qxz (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2017 12:53:55 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:59539 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752077AbdC1Qxy (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2017 12:53:54 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 09:53:43 -0700 From: Davidlohr Bueso To: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: mhocko@suse.com, ak@linux.intel.com, mtk.manpages@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,hugetlb: compute page_size_log properly Message-ID: <20170328165343.GB27446@linux-80c1.suse> Mail-Followup-To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@suse.com, ak@linux.intel.com, mtk.manpages@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso References: <1488992761-9464-1-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1488992761-9464-1-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 226 Lines: 7 Do we have any consensus here? Keeping SHM_HUGE_* is currently winning 2-1. If there are in fact users out there computing the value manually, then I am ok with keeping it and properly exporting it. Michal? Thanks, Davidlohr