Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 09:55:13 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@suse.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
        mtk.manpages@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>,
        khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,hugetlb: compute page_size_log properly
Message-ID: <20170328165513.GC27446@linux-80c1.suse>
Mail-Followup-To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@suse.com,
        ak@linux.intel.com, mtk.manpages@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>,
        khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com
References: <1488992761-9464-1-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net>
 <20170328165343.GB27446@linux-80c1.suse>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170328165343.GB27446@linux-80c1.suse>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 310
Lines: 11

Sorry, forgot to add Anshuman.

On Tue, 28 Mar 2017, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:

>Do we have any consensus here? Keeping SHM_HUGE_* is currently
>winning 2-1. If there are in fact users out there computing the
>value manually, then I am ok with keeping it and properly exporting
>it. Michal?
>
>Thanks,
>Davidlohr