Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755410AbdC1S6U (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2017 14:58:20 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([178.209.37.122]:38204 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751921AbdC1S6T (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2017 14:58:19 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 20:58:16 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Vivien Didelot Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@savoirfairelinux.com, "David S. Miller" , Florian Fainelli Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: fix 88E6191 ops Message-ID: <20170328185816.GC2268@lunn.ch> References: <20170328175035.13897-1-vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> <20170328175035.13897-4-vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170328175035.13897-4-vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 381 Lines: 10 On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:50:34PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote: > The mv88e6xxx_info structure for the 88E6191 chip was pointing the > mv88e6391_ops definition instead of mv88e6191_ops. Fix this. mv88e6391_ops and mv88e6191_ops appear to be identical, so effectively there is no bug here. So no need to have this in -stable. Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn Andrew