Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932307AbdC1VB6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2017 17:01:58 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55436 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751882AbdC1VB5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Mar 2017 17:01:57 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 4D11281235 Authentication-Results: ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=riel@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 4D11281235 Message-ID: <1490734912.8850.85.camel@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [BUG nohz]: wrong user and system time accounting From: Rik van Riel To: Luiz Capitulino Cc: Wanpeng Li , Frederic Weisbecker , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 17:01:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170328161454.4a5d9e8b@redhat.com> References: <20170323165512.60945ac6@redhat.com> <1490636129.8850.76.camel@redhat.com> <20170328132406.7d23579c@redhat.com> <20170328161454.4a5d9e8b@redhat.com> Organization: Red Hat, Inc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.25]); Tue, 28 Mar 2017 21:01:56 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1220 Lines: 29 On Tue, 2017-03-28 at 16:14 -0400, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 13:24:06 -0400 > Luiz Capitulino wrote: > > I'm starting to suspect that the nohz code may be programming > > the tick period to be shorter than 1ms when it re-activates > > the tick. > > And I think I was right, it looks like the nohz code is programming > the tick period incorrectly when restarting the tick. The patch below > fixes things for me, but I still have some homework todo and more > testing before posting a patch for inclusion. Could you guys test it? Your patch seems to work. I don't claim to understand why your patch makes a difference, but for this particular test case, on this particular setup, it seems to work... > diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c > index 7fe53be..9abe979 100644 > --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c > +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c > @@ -1152,6 +1152,7 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart > tick_sched_timer(struct hrtimer *timer) >         struct pt_regs *regs = get_irq_regs(); >         ktime_t now = ktime_get(); >   > +       ts->last_tick = now; >         tick_sched_do_timer(now); >   >         /*