Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753415AbdC2Fwo (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2017 01:52:44 -0400 Received: from mail-vk0-f44.google.com ([209.85.213.44]:33023 "EHLO mail-vk0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753355AbdC2Fwm (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2017 01:52:42 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1490765455-8556-1-git-send-email-anup.patel@broadcom.com> From: Anup Patel Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:22:25 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] Broadcom FlexRM ring manager support To: Jassi Brar Cc: Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Ray Jui , Scott Branden , Pramod KUMAR , Rob Rice , Devicetree List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , BCM Kernel Feedback Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1308 Lines: 33 On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Jassi Brar wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Anup Patel wrote: >> The Broadcom FlexRM ring manager provides producer-consumer style >> ring interface for offload engines on Broadcom iProc SoCs. We can >> have one or more instances of Broadcom FlexRM ring manager in a SoC. >> >> This patchset adds a mailbox driver for Broadcom FlexRM ring manager >> which can be used by offload engine drivers as mailbox clients. >> >> The Broadcom FlexRM mailbox driver is feature complete for RAID and >> Crypto offload engines. We will have incremental patches in-future >> for ring-level statistics using debugfs and minor optimizations. >> >> This patchset is based on Linux-4.11-rc4 and it is also available >> at flexrm-v7 branch of https://github.com/Broadcom/arm64-linux.git >> >> Changes since v6: >> - Rebased patches for Linux-4.11-rc4 >> - Added a patch to remove depends on COMPILE_TEST for kconfig >> option BCM_FLEXRM_MBOX >> > You only needed to send the fix to compilation failure reports, not > the whole series. My bad for the noise. > I believe only the patch-3 is new in the series and I need not even > look at patch-1,2 ? Yes, only patch-3 is required to fix compilation failure. Regards, Anup