Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 05:34:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 05:33:58 -0500 Received: from ha1.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au ([203.164.2.50]:44161 "EHLO mss.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 28 Feb 2001 05:33:45 -0500 Message-ID: <3A9CD304.26C3A568@optushome.com.au> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 21:29:24 +1100 From: Glenn McGrath X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.1 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Helge Hafting CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: devfs and /proc/ide/hda In-Reply-To: <3A9CCA76.3E6AB93A@optushome.com.au> <3A9CD2F3.E26A2884@idb.hist.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Helge Hafting wrote: > > Glenn McGrath wrote: > > > > Im running kernel 2.4.1, I have entries like /proc/ide/hda, > > /proc/ide/ide0/hda etc irrespective of wether im using devfs or > > traditional device names. > > > > Is always using traditional device names for /proc/ide intentional, or > > is it something nobody has gotten around to fixing yet? > > Using devfs changes the names in /dev. I don't think it > is supposed to affect /proc in any way. And there are programs out > that use the existing /proc - changing it won't be popular. > Well leaving it the way it is doesnt make much sense either really, it refers to devices that dont exist. Glenn - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/