Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264582AbTE1HUh (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2003 03:20:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264589AbTE1HUh (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2003 03:20:37 -0400 Received: from lindsey.linux-systeme.com ([80.190.48.67]:2567 "EHLO mx00.linux-systeme.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264582AbTE1HUg (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2003 03:20:36 -0400 From: Marc-Christian Petersen Organization: Working Overloaded Linux Kernel To: Jens Axboe , Con Kolivas Subject: Re: 2.4.20: Proccess stuck in __lock_page ... Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 09:32:29 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 Cc: manish , Carl-Daniel Hailfinger , Andrea Arcangeli , Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christian Klose , William Lee Irwin III References: <3ED2DE86.2070406@storadinc.com> <200305281713.24357.kernel@kolivas.org> <20030528071355.GO845@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20030528071355.GO845@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200305280930.48810.m.c.p@wolk-project.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 729 Lines: 21 On Wednesday 28 May 2003 09:13, Jens Axboe wrote: Hi Jens, > If you leave nr_requests as it is, I don't see why it should not boot > with batch_requests == 0. > I can't see in all of these mails whether backing out akpm's starvation > patch makes the problem go away. Does it? If you mean "http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.4/diffs/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c@1.29?nav=index.html|ChangeSet@-2y|cset@1.160|hist/drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c" that one, the answer is YES. ciao, Marc - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/